Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;10(13):6310–6332. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6362

TABLE 4.

Multicriteria table indicating the score of each primer set for the three assessment steps performed

Analyses Criteria MG2 MG2fwh MG2ANML‐degen fwh1 fwh2 fwhFol Lep1 mlHCO Hex Zeale Epp‐degen Epp Score details
In silico Mean amplification success 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 ≥100 ]50:100[ ≥50
Mean penalty 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 ≤50 ]50:80[ ≥80
In vivo—mock communities Bat identification 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 3 2 0 PCR/3 2 PCRs/3 3 PCRs/3
Arthropod taxa detection success 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 2 ≤80% ]80%: 90%[ ≥90%
Identification at the species level 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 1 1 ≤10 taxa ]10:15[ ≥15
In vivo—guano Bat identification 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 3 3 0 1 sp 2 sp
Occurrence of prey taxa 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 ≤100 ]100:130[ ≥130
Number of orders 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 ≤5 ]5:10[ ≥10
Number of families 2 3 2 3 3 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 ≤25 ]25:30[ ≥30
Number of genus 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 ≤50 ]50:70[ ≥70
Number of species 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 ≤60 ]60:80[ ≥80
Cumulative score 28 29 28 32 28 25 16 21 20 22 22 16

Scores range from the less efficient (“1” represented in red) to the most efficient (“3” represented in green).