FIGURE 3.

Offspring production across predator cue treatments, including both infected and uninfected individuals. Including both infected and uninfected females, we found that females in the sustained exposure treatment had significantly more offspring than the no predator cue treatment (5.29 ± 2.42 SE; p = .0304), a pattern that was not detected in the early exposure treatment (p = .35). Our linear model that included an interaction between predator cue treatment and infection status did not detect any significant predictors of number of offspring, though being infected had a nearly significant and negative effect (−6.368 ± 3.600 SE; p = .079), while being infected in the sustained predator cue treatment had a nearly significant and positive effect (8.364 ± 5.008; p = .097), suggesting that being infected in the no predator cue treatment resulted in low offspring production