Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;10:253. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00936-w

Table 3.

Studies assessing the effects of CO2 post exposure, specifying test used, delivery methods, concentration or flow rate used, strain and sex, and a summary of results.

Strain Sex Test Delivery method Concentration/flow rate Treatment Results Reference
SD M Vogel Pf 35:65% (CO2:O2) CO2 ↓ liking (40%a) 51
Alprazolam (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) + CO2 ↑ likinga
SD M Pavlovian conditioning Pf From 1 to 100% CO2 CO2 + vanilla odor ↑ of freezing episodes with CO2 concentration 55
SD M Open field Gfa 20% CO2 ↑ 15% thigmotaxisa; ↑ fecal boli productiona 64
SD M Open field Gfa 20% CO2 ↑ 15% thigmotaxisa; ↑ fecal boli productiona 34
SD M Social interaction Gfa 20% ↓ 50% social interactionsa 24
SD M Open field Gfa 20% CO2  ↔ thigmotaxis and line crossinga 75
Lorazepam + CO2
1 mg/kg i.p. ↓ line crossingb
0.5 mg/kg i.p. ↔ line crossingb
0.3 mg/kg i.p. ↔ line crossingb
0.1 mg/kg i.p. ↔ line crossingb
SD M Social interaction Gfa 20% CO2 ↓ social interactionsa 75
Lorazepam + CO2
1 mg/kg i.p. ↓ social interactionsb
0.5 mg/kg i.p. ↔ social interactionsb
0.3 mg/kg i.p. ↑ social interactionsb
0.1 mg/kg i.p. ↑ social interactionsb

Strain: SD Sprague Dawley; delivery method: Pf pre-fill, GFa 20% CO2 challenge; concentration or flow rate: static concentration (%) or flow rate (% CO2 chamber vol. min−1); sex: M male, F female; results: ↑ increase, ↓ decrease, ↔ no change in behavior or absent; i.p. intraperitoneal.

aCompared to control rats exposed to air.

bCompared to rats treated with vehicle.