Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;10:12391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68837-y

Table 2.

Firing rate comparisons1.

MGB AC
L NL L NL
STD_control 0.1912 0.1717 0.1990 0.1856
STD_MK-801 0.0537 0.1047 0.0689 0.0547
P value  < 0.000  < 0.000  < 0.000  < 0.000
DEV_control 0.6153 0.6887 0.7274 0.7930
DEV_MK-801 0.6611 0.6620 0.8424 0.9247
P value 0.2309 0.2641  < 0.000  < 0.000
CAS_control 0.7104 0.6395 0.6052 0.5196
CAS_MK-801 0.7244 0.7063 0.4701 0.3458
P value 0.1169  < 0.000  < 0.000  < 0.000
iMM_control 0.3675 0.4897 0.5124 0.5781
iMM_MK-801 0.5197 0.5221 0.7269 0.8088
P value  < 0.000 0.0409  < 0.000  < 0.000
iPE_control − 0.0670 0.0513 0.1060 0.2697
iPE_MK-801 − 0.0502 − 0.0444 0.3592 0.5652
P value 0.9622 0.0035 0.000  < 0.000
iRS_control 0.5300 0.3672 0.3350 0.2935
iRSdrug 0.6812 0.5632 0.3514 0.2765
P value  < 0.000  < 0.000 0.5800 0.8934

1Comparative analysis between control and MK-801 group. Median spikes to the former measures responses to standard (STD), deviant (DEV) and cascade (CAS) tones, and their corresponding p value (ranksum test). Similarly, medians and their associates p value for the index of mismatch (iMM), index of prediction error (iPE), and index of repetition suppression (iRS). Significant p values are in “bold”