Table 2.

Firing rate comparisons¹.

	MGB		AC
	L	NL	L	NL
STD_control	0.1912	0.1717	0.1990	0.1856
STD_MK-801	0.0537	0.1047	0.0689	0.0547
P value	< 0.000	< 0.000	< 0.000	< 0.000
DEV_control	0.6153	0.6887	0.7274	0.7930
DEV_MK-801	0.6611	0.6620	0.8424	0.9247
P value	0.2309	0.2641	< 0.000	< 0.000
CAS_control	0.7104	0.6395	0.6052	0.5196
CAS_MK-801	0.7244	0.7063	0.4701	0.3458
P value	0.1169	< 0.000	< 0.000	< 0.000
iMM_control	0.3675	0.4897	0.5124	0.5781
iMM_MK-801	0.5197	0.5221	0.7269	0.8088
P value	< 0.000	0.0409	< 0.000	< 0.000
iPE_control	− 0.0670	0.0513	0.1060	0.2697
iPE_MK-801	− 0.0502	− 0.0444	0.3592	0.5652
P value	0.9622	0.0035	0.000	< 0.000
iRS_control	0.5300	0.3672	0.3350	0.2935
iRSdrug	0.6812	0.5632	0.3514	0.2765
P value	< 0.000	< 0.000	0.5800	0.8934

¹Comparative analysis between control and MK-801 group. Median spikes to the former measures responses to standard (STD), deviant (DEV) and cascade (CAS) tones, and their corresponding p value (ranksum test). Similarly, medians and their associates p value for the index of mismatch (iMM), index of prediction error (iPE), and index of repetition suppression (iRS). Significant p values are in “bold”