Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;2020:1817931. doi: 10.1155/2020/1817931

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the prognostic value of PD-L1 in OS and DFS in CCA.

Subgroup factors No. of studies No. of patients HR (95% CI) p Effects model Heterogeneity
I 2 (%) p
Overall survival
 Total 17 1982 1.58 (1.30-1.92) <0.001 REM 65.7 <0.001
Ethnicity
 Caucasian 5 363 2.14 (1.52-3.02) <0.001 FEM 11.8 0.338
 Asian 12 1619 1.49 (1.20-1.84) <0.001 REM 70.7 <0.001
Treatment
 Surgery 16 1956 1.61 (1.32-1.95) <0.001 REM 67.0 <0.001
 Nonsurgery 1 26 0.70 (0.19-2.60) 0.595
Tumor location
 iCCA 5 844 1.31 (0.88-1.95) 0.180 REM 76.9 0.002
 eCCA 8 719 1.71 (1.25-2.36) <0.001 REM 63.1 0.008
 CCA 4 419 1.98 (1.47-2.65) <0.001 FEM 44.2 0.146
Disease-free survival
 Total 7 896 1.03 (0.68-1.55) 0.895 REM 72.6 0.001
Ethnicity
 Caucasian 1 26 1.13 (0.55-2.34) 0.742
 Asian 6 870 1.00 (0.62-1.61) 0.991 REM 77.2 0.001
Treatment
 Surgery 5 840 0.97 (0.56-1.69) 0.911 REM 81.7 <0.001
 Non-surgery 2 56 1.12 (0.67-1.85) 0.667 FEM 0 0.965
Tumor location
 iCCA 2 512 1.02 (0.36-2.92) 0.972 REM 92.2 <0.001
 eCCA 3 328 0. (0.40-2.03) 0.800 REM 77.1 0.013
 CCA 2 56 1.12 (0.67-1.85) 0.667 FEM 0 0.965

FEM: fixed-effects model; REM: random-effects model.