Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2020 Jul 25;21:333. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03655-7

Table 2.

Summary of bootstrap resampling results for the four subC signatures compared in the study

	subC signature:
Quantity:	LP	CMS	PAM50	RANDOM
hR(S)	0.303 [0.18, 0.50] _0.95	0.35 [0.22, 0.56] _0.95	0.368 [0.20, 0.78] _0.95	0.443 [0.27, 0.82] _0.95
hR(R)	0.722 [0.45, 1.04] _0.95	0.65 [0.40, 0.94] _0.95	0.526 [0.35, 0.79] _0.95	0.519 [0.21, 0.78] _0.95
ρ = hR(S) / hR(R)	0.426 [0.19, 0.96] _0.95	0.547 [0.25, 1.23] _0.95	0.675 [0.28, 1.9] _0.95	0.89 [0.39, 2.6] _0.95
n(S)	104 [72, 139] _0.95	108 [59, 151] _0.95	74 [29, 119] _0.95	100 [48, 158] _0.95
pRisk	0.018	0.035	0.161	0.424