Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;8(7):3900–3911. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1699

TABLE 5.

Comparison of dietary sodium and sugar intakes at pre‐ and postintervention based on the perceived taste preferences

Low‐salt preference (n = 28) High‐salt preference (n = 26)
0 weeks 8 weeks p‐value 0 weeks 8 weeks p‐value
24‐hr dietary recall
Na intake (mg) 3,671.0 ± 1,170.5 a 2,753.9 ± 1,067.9 .005** 3,871.5 ± 1532.6 2,716.8 ± 964.6 .003**
FFQ
Na intake (mg) 4,403.9 ± 2,147.6 4,074.8 ± 3,449.2 .084 5,422.0 ± 3,094.0 3,412.0 ± 1531.9 .001**
Low‐sugar preference (n = 28) High‐sugar preference (n = 23)
0 weeks 8 weeks p‐value 0 weeks 8 weeks p‐value
24‐hr dietary recall
Total sugar b (g) 41.3 ± 21.5 53.3 ± 30.2 .052 67.8 ± 34.7 1 57.2 ± 22.7 .141
Sugar from processed‐food c (g) 12.0 ± 14.2 10.5 ± 12.9 .737 25.4 ± 24.7 2 10.7 ± 13.9 .014*
FFQ
Total sugar (g) 52.1 ± 28.7 43.4 ± 28.1 .139 83.5 ± 45.6 1 53.1 ± 39.3 .000***

Abbreviation: FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire.

a

Values are mean ± SD.

b

Total sugar: Sugar intake from staple foods, milk, fruit, and processed food.

c

Processed food included coffee, beverages, snacks, bakery products, soda, dairy products, ice cream, and simple sugar.

1

Significantly different between the groups at 0 weeks by the independent t test or Mann–Whitney U test at p < .05.

2

Significantly different between the groups at 0 weeks by the independent t test or Mann–Whitney U test at p < .01.

*

Significantly different between the groups by the paired t test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test at p < .05.

**

Significantly different between the groups by the paired t test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test at p < .01.

***

Significantly different between the groups by the paired t test and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test at p < .001.