Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;59(8):2109–2114. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa021

Table 1.

The performance of a commercial line blot compared with immunoprecipitation

Autoantibody (n) Line blot result Number of samples with index MSAA as false positivea Specificity Sensitivity Cohen’s κ
False negative True positive
Mi2a (25) 9 16 0 1 0.64 0.77
Mi2b (25) 17 8 7 0.98 0.32 0.37
Mi2a or Mi2b (25) 7 18 7 0.98 0.72 0.70
TIF1γ (25) 10 15 2 0.99 0.6 0.70
MDA5 (25) 3 22 4 0.99 0.88 0.85
NXP2 (25) 4 21 0 1 0.84 0.91
SAE (25) 1 24 2 0.99 0.96 0.94
Ku (24) 0 24 12 0.97 0.97 0.78
PM/Scl-75 (25) 11 14 10 0.98 0.56 0.56
PM/Scl- 100 (25) 5 20 3 0.99 0.8 0.82
PM/Scl-75 or PM/Scl-100 (25) 4 21 13 96.2 0.84 0.69
Jo-1 (25) 3 22 4 0.98 0.82 0.85
SRP (25) 2 23 6 0.98 0.92 0.84
PL-7 (21) 5 16 5 0.99 0.64 0.75
PL-12 (20) 2 18 5 0.99 0.9 0.83
EJ (10) 4 6 0 1 0.6 0.76
OJ (14) 14 0 1 1 0 0
Zo (9)
KS (3)
Ha (1)
HMGCR (25)
Healthy controls (68) 0 0 11b
Total (395) 54 199c 54d 0.62 0.78 0.41

The sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s κ coefficient for each assay are shown. Tests with κ < 0.8 are highlighted in bold.

a

Some samples contained more than one false positive result. In total, 54 samples contained at least one false positive result.

b

One sample was positive for anti-Ro52. The 11 listed were positive for myositis-specific autoantibodies. Anti-Ro52 were excluded from specificity calculations, as immunoprecipitation is unable to detect this autoantibody, which can be found in healthy individuals.

c

Samples that contained a true positive result and no false positive result.

d

Number of samples analysed containing at least one false positive result.