Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;28(2):84–93. doi: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.84-93

Table 2. Results of the methodological evaluations. * probability of null hypothesis calculated by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (if frequencies less than five) for categorical data, and by Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance for continuous data.

Slovenia Croatia Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia p*
Failure to specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria? 6 (18%) 4 (9%) 7 (16%) 4 (9%) 0.595
Failure to determine and report the error of your measurement methods? 11 (32%) 19 (44%) 18 (41%) 26 (60%) 0.006
Failure to specify the exact statistical assumptions made in the analysis? 25 (74%) 22 (51%) 26 (59%) 37 (86%) 0.000
Failure to perform sample size analysis before the study begins? 30 (88%) 37 (86%) 39 (89%) 42 (98%) 0.215
Failure to implement adequate bias control measures? 16 (47%) 21 (49%) 26 (59%) 31 (72%) 0.006
Failure to vigorously recruit and retain subjects? 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 4 (10%) 0 (0%) 0.077
Failure to examine for normality of the data? 25 (74%) 21 (49%) 23 (52%) 38 (88%) 0.000
Failure to report missing data, dropped subjects and use of an intention to treat analysis? 4 (12%) 11 (26%) 32 (73%) 31 (72%) 0.000
Failure to point out the weaknesses of your own study? 14 (41%) 12 (28%) 27 (61%) 31 (72%) 0.000
Number of satisfied criteria per study: mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range 5.1 ± 1.7, 5.0, [2.0] 5.5 ± 1.5, 6.0, [2.0] 3.6 ± 1.8, 3.0, [3.0] 3.4 ± 1.1, 3.0, [1.0] 0.000
Number of studies that satisfied more than 4 criteria 22 (65%) 32 (74%) 13 (30%) 7 (16%) 0.000