Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 25;20:85. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00486-z

Table 2.

Comparisons of each Parameters between Malignant and Benign Groups

Characteristic Grouping Total Statistical Magnitude P value
Malignant Benign
Age(y) 59 (55.8 ± 14.1) 56 (54.8 ± 13.6) 58.5 (55.3 ± 13.8) Z = -0.112 0.911
Sex χ2 = 1.322 0.336
 Male 23 (58.97%) 16 (41.03%) 39
 Female 16 (51.61%) 15 (48.39%) 31
FDG uptake χ2 = 6.911 0.009
 Higher 30 (81.1%) 17 (51.5%) 47
 Opposite 7 (18.9%) 16 (48.5%) 23
FDG distribution χ2 = 8.036 0.005
 Heterogeneously 28 (75.7%) 14 (42.4%) 42
 Homogeneously 9 (24.3%) 19 (57.6%) 28
Boundary χ2 = 8.226 0.004
 Obscure 30 (81.1%) 16 (48.5%) 46
 Clear 7 (18.9%) 17 (51.5%) 24
Density χ2 = 6.708 0.010
 Uneven 27 (73.0%) 14 (42.4%) 41
 Uniform 10 (27.0%) 19 (57.6%) 29
Size (cm) 7 (7.5 ± 4.2) 3.8 (4.8 ± 5.2) 5.3 (6.2 ± 4.9) Z = -3.490 < 0.001
SUVmaxa 8.7 (12.4 ± 9) 4.7 (7 ± 5.2) 6.9 (9.8 ± 7.9) Z = -3.507 < 0.001
MTVb(cm3) 36 (57.7 ± 54.9) 15 (18.8 ± 16.5) 24.8 (39.4 ± 45.6) Z = -3.406 0.001
TLGc 251.4 (426.3 ± 513.8) 37.6 (81.1 ± 119.8) 102.4 (263.6 ± 417.7) Z = -4.159 < 0.001
HFd 0.84 (1.39 ± 1.31) 0.54 (0.38 ± 0.35) 0.56 (0.92 ± 1.1) Z = -4.171 < 0.001

a for maximum standardized uptake value, b for metabolic tumor volume, c for total lesion glycolysis, d for heterogeneous factor, statistical description by n (%) or median (χ ± s)