Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 25;21:302. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01963-x

Table 3.

Effect estimates of CAC progression for PD compared with HD assessed by Tobit regression

∆CAC score (per year) Coefficient 95% CI P
Unadjusted model (PD as ref.) −32.7 −174.9 to 109.4 0.649
Adjusted model 1 (PD as ref.) −59.4 − 202.6 to 83.8 0.413
Adjusted model 2 (PD as ref.) −44.7 −184.0 to 94.6 0.526
Adjusted model 3 (PD as ref.) −112.3 − 285.7 to 61.2 0.201
Adjusted model 4 (PD as ref.) −130.2 −308.0 to 47.5 0.148

Notes:

Adjusted model 1: adjusted for age and gender;

Adjusted model 2: adjusted model 1 + dialysis vintage and diabetes mellitus;

Adjusted model 3: adjusted model 2 + Alb, Ca, P, iPTH, CRP, T-Cho;

Adjusted model 4: adjusted model 3 + non-calcium P binder, Vitamin D analogue