Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Mar;60(3):412–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.10.023

Table IV.

Checklist for quality assessment of case reports or case series describing innovative therapies

Checklist for reporting cases and case series
Diagnosis Are diagnostic criteria clearly identified, and met by patient(s)?
Informed consent Has patient consent been documented?
For prospective studies: is IRB approval documented?
Natural disease course Is there any reference to natural course of disease, or, if applicable, course on standard treatment?
Dosages Are treatments’ dosage, duration, and titration described adequately?
Oucome measures Are outcomes well defined and clinically relevant? Are they subjective, standardized, or subjective?
Patient perception Is there any documentation of the patients’ perception of outcome and of the intervention?
Safety Do the authors describe known risks associated with intervention?
Authors’ conclusions Do the authors abstain from unfounded claims about safety and efficacy?
Inclusion and exclusion criteria* Are inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated?
Consecutive cases* Are all consecutive patients treated by one physician or at one institution included?

IRB, Institutional review board.

*

For case series.