Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;555:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.07.007

Table 1.

Positive hits from the Cayman Epigenetics Screening Library. These compounds reduced RFP by at least 50% at 24 hpi - the percentage values indicate the RFP levels in cells treated with 1 μM drug relative to vehicle-treated cells (100% RFP) in the screen.

Compound % RFPa Mode of action
1) Chaetocinb 10 Methyltransferase inhibitor
2) Apicidinb 12 HDAC inhibitor
3) HC Toxinb 13 HDAC inhibitor
4) Panobinostatb 14 HDAC inhibitor
5) Givinostat 17 HDAC inhibitor
6) Oxamflatin 17 HDAC inhibitor
7) Gemcitabineb 18 DNA synthesis inhibitor
8) Trifluoroacetate salt 29 HDAC inhibitor
9) Pracinostat 20 HDAC inhibitor
10) TSA 22 HDAC inhibitor
11) Lestaurtinib 22 Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
12) Decitabine 25 DNMT-1 inhibitor
12) LAQ824b 32 HDAC inhibitor
14) CAY10603 34 HDAC inhibitor
15) CUDC-101 37 Multi-targeted inhibitor of HDACs, EGFR, HER2
16) M344 41 HDAC inhibitor
17) 4-iodo-SAHA 45 HDAC inhibitor
18) CBHA 47 HDAC inhibitor
19) Scriptaid 49 HDAC inhibitor
a

Values represent the mean of three experimental replicates. The CV for all compounds was <35%, with the exception of CUDC-101 (61%) and LAQ824 (111%).

b

These compounds were also identified as positive hits when the screen was conducted with all compounds at 0.25 μM. The RFP percentage for chaetocin, apicidin, HC toxin, panobinostat, gemcitabine and LAQ824 were 34%, 42%, 35%, 32%, 44% and 32%, respectively.