Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;18(3):395–401. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.3.395

Table 2.

Levels of native thiol, total thiol, disulfide, disulfide/native thiol, disulfide/total thiol, and native/total thiol according to groups

Variable Bipolar depression Unipolar depression Control pvalue Pairwise comparison
Native thiol (SH) 310.6 ± 51.6 327.3 ± 53.3 344.4 ± 49.5 0.011a BD vs. UD, p = 0.518
BD vs. C, p = 0.009
UD vs. C, p = 0.447
Total thiol (ToSH) 358.0 ± 53.5 377.9 ± 54.7 383.8 ± 52.1 0.081a -
Disulfide (SS) 22.15 (12.35−49.3) 25.95 (17.65−33) 19.23 (12.55−31.35) < 0.001b BD vs. UD, p = 0.132
BD vs. C, p = 0.015
UD vs. C, p < 0.001
Disulfide/native thiol (SS/SH) 6.64 (4.38−28.97) 7.91 (5.3−12.32) 5.72 (3.71−8.26) < 0.001b BD vs. UD, p = 0.494
BD vs. C, p = 0.001
UD vs. C, p < 0.001
Disulfide/total thiol (SS/ToSH) 5.86 (4.03−18.34) 6.83 (4.8−9.89) 5.13 (3.46−7.09) < 0.001b BD vs. UD, p = 0.491
BD vs. C, p = 0.001
UD vs. C, p < 0.001
Native thiol/total thiol (SH/ToSH) 88.28 (63.32−91.94) 86.35 (80.23−90.41) 89.74 (85.83−93.09) < 0.001b BD vs. UD, p = 0.489
BD vs. C, p < 0.001
UD vs. C, p = 0.001

Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (minimum−maximum) for continuous variables.

BD, bipolar depression; UD, unipolar depression; C, control.

a

ANOVA (analysis of variance). bKruskal−Wallis test. Bonferroni correction was used for pairwise comparisons. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.