Table 2.
Indication | Data-item name (values) | Data-item verifiable in EHR | |
---|---|---|---|
No of patients | Percentage | ||
MRI (n = 394) | |||
Pregnant | 394 | 100 | |
Age at time MRI (years) | 394 | 100 | |
Morphology (i.e., lobular carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, other) | 394 | 100 | |
Mammography well assessable (yes or no) | 282 | 72 | |
Tumor distribution (not registered, unifocal, multicentric) | 383 | 97 | |
Discrepancy tumor size: clinical vs. on imaging (no or yes) | 394 | 100 | |
All data-items available | 276 | 70 | |
Preoperative systemic treatment (n = 394) | |||
Clinical M-stage* (not registered, cM0 or cM1) | 52 | 13 | |
Clinical N-stage (not registered, cN0, cN1, cN2, cN3) | 394 | 100 | |
Clinical T-stage (not registered, cT1a, cT1b, cT1c, cT2, cT3, cT4) | 394 | 100 | |
Gender (female) | 394 | 100 | |
ER status (not registered, ER+ , ER−) | 390 | 99 | |
All data-items available | 52 | 13 | |
Adjuvant systemic treatment (367 patients underwent surgery) | |||
Pathologic N-stage (not registered, pN0, pN1, pN2, pN3) | 367 | 100 | |
N0 risk status | |||
Age (years) | 367 | 100 | |
Pathologic T-stage (not registered, pTis, pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, pT2, pT3, pT4) | 367 | 100 | |
Tumor grade postoperatively** (not registered, BR gr1, BR gr2, BR gr3) | 359 | 98 | |
HER2 status postoperatively (not registered, Her2+ , Her2−) | 367 | 100 | |
ER status*** (not registered, ER+ , ER−) | 364 | 99 | |
Age (years) | 367 | 100 | |
All data-items available | 356 | 97 | |
Immediate breast reconstruction (367 patients underwent surgery)a | |||
Clinical M-stage** (not registered, cM0 or cM1) | 50 | 14 | |
Clinical N-stage (not registered, cN0, cN1, cN2, cN3) | 367 | 100 | |
Clinical T-stage (not registered, cT1a, cT1b, cT1c, cT2, cT3, cT4) | 367 | 100 | |
Tumor distribution (not registered, unifocal, multicentric) | 356 | 97 | |
All data-items available | 46 | 13 |
BR Bloom Richardson grade
*Clinical M-stage was not explicitly reported, only when staging (PET CT) was performed
**In 7 patients, the pathologist reported that the tumor size was too small for BR grading and in one patient the BR grade was not reported
***In 367 patients, 48 were ER−, 316 ER+ and ER in 3 patients was not possible because of pTis status (no invasive tumor was found)
aIn case of breast-conserving surgery (n = 264), in 0 patient reasons for direct reconstruction were reported. In case of modified radical mastectomy (n = 103), in 29 patients reasons for immediate breast reconstruction were reported