Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;183(2):355–363. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05769-1

Table 3.

Concordance of recommendations generated by the MDT versus the CDTs in patients of which all data-items were available during MDT meetings

Recommendation Patients Concordant Not concordant
N % N % Reasons not documented Reasons documented
N % N %
MRI scan 276 70
Recommended/for consideration 49 18 48 98 1 2 NA NA
Not recommended 227 82 6 3 219 96 2* 1
PST 52 13
Recommended/for consideration 49 94 33 67 13 27 3** 6
Not recommended 3 6 0 0 3 100 NA NA
AST 356a 97
Recommended/for consideration 257 72 253 98 NA NA 4b 2
Not recommended 98 28 91 93 NA NA 7c 7
IBR 46 13
Recommended 28 61 2 7 24 86 2d 7
For consideration 18 39 0 0 18 100 NA NA

*Two patients received preoperative systemic treatment with preference to omit surgery in case of response to preoperative systemic therapy

**In three patients, preoperative systemic therapy was reported as an alternative in the electronic health record

aIn one patient, the sentinel node procedure did not identify the sentinel node, and no pN status was available

bThree patients deliberately decided not to start adjuvant systemic treatment

cSeven patients were referred to the oncologist for the reason of "border-line" indication for adjuvant systemic treatment

dIn two patients, the MDT did not recommend immediate breast reconstruction because irradiation of the thoracic wall was idicated