Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;16:1745–1754. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S252293

Table 4.

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, and Accuracy at Various Cutoff Points of HCage and HCnorm for Predicting Aβ Positivity in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Cutoff Sensitivity Specificity Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value Accuracy
HCage
 >-14.6 100 2.8 45.3 100.0 46.2
 >-14.1 98.3 2.8 44.9 66.7 45.4
 >-13.6 93.1 15.3 47.0 73.3 50.0
 >-13.1 89.7 31.9 51.5 79.3 57.7
 >-12.6 81.0 56.9 60.3 78.8 67.7
 >-12.1 62.1 76.4 68.0 71.4 70.0
 >-11.6 39.7 87.5 71.9 64.3 66.2
 >-11.1 17.2 98.6 90.9 59.6 62.3
 >-10.6 5.2 100.0 10.0 56.7 57.7
HCnorm
 ≤91 93.1 23.6 49.6 80.9 54.6
 ≤82 89.7 30.6 51.0 78.6 56.9
 ≤73 87.9 37.5 53.2 79.4 60.0
 ≤64 82.8 43.1 54.0 75.6 60.8
 ≤55 79.3 51.4 56.8 75.5 63.8
 ≤46 74.1 56.9 58.1 73.2 64.6
 ≤37 70.7 65.3 62.2 73.4 67.7
 ≤28 69.0 72.2 66.7 74.3 70.8
 ≤19 60.6 76.4 67.3 70.5 69.2
 ≤10 44.8 84.7 70.3 65.6 66.9

Notes: The results of exploration on how the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy change as the HCage increases from −14.6 to −10.6 by 0.5. Y =12.047+ −0.087X1 + −14.192X2, where Y is the prediction score of HCage, X1 is age, and X2 is %HC/ICV.

Abbreviations: Aβ, beta-amyloid; HCnorm, normative percentiles of hippocampal volume.