Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):e00743-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00743-20

TABLE 3.

Clinical performance comparison of four EUA molecular assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab specimens (n = 104)

Molecular assay
and result
No. of results by
reference standarda
Kappa (κ) (± 95% CI)b,c PPA (± 95% CI)c NPA (± 95% CI)c
Positive Negative
Modified CDC
    Positive 51 1d 0.98 (0.94–1) 100 (0.93–1) 98 (0.89–0.99)
    Negative 0 52
DiaSorin Molecular
    Positive 51 0 1.0 (0.99–1) 100 (0.93–1) 100 (0.93–1)
    Negative 0 53
GenMark
    Positive 49 0 0.96 (0.91–1) 96 (0.87–0.99) 100 (0.93–1)
    Negative 2e 53
Hologic
    Positive 51 2f 0.96 (0.91–1) 100 (0.93–1) 96 (0.87–0.99)
    Negative 0 51
a

The reference standard was defined as the result obtained from at least 3 of the 4 molecular assays.

b

Kappa values representing levels of agreement are categorized as follows: >0.90, almost perfect; 0.80 to 0.90, strong; 0.60 to 0.79, moderate; 0.40 to 0.59, weak; 0.21 to 0.39, minimal; (0 to 0.20), none.

c

± 95% CI, upper/lower 95% confidence interval.

d

This one sample had cycle threshold (CT) values of 38.9 and 39.6 for N1 and N2, respectively, by the CDC assay.

e

Cycle threshold (CT) value undetermined.

f

These two samples had cycle threshold (CT) values of 36.2 and 38.5 by the Hologic assay.