Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;12:1758835920940886. doi: 10.1177/1758835920940886

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for the predictive factors of pathological complete response.

Variables Comparison for OR Univariate analysis (n = 111)
Multivariate analysis (n = 111)
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
EPIC1 High versus low expression 0.727 0.298 1.774 0.484 0.278 0.082 0.935 0.039
Age ⩾50 versus <50 years 1.512 0.671 3.410 0.319 0.679 0.227 2.031 0.489
T stage T3–T4 versus T2 0.364 0.136 0.976 0.045 0.241 0.071 0.814 0.022
N stage N1–N3 versus N0 0.795 0.210 3.007 0.736 0.495 0.085 2.896 0.435
ER status Positive versus negative 0.179 0.077 0.418 <0.001 0.132 0.039 0.446 0.001
PR status Positive versus negative 0.480 0.214 1.079 0.076 1.088 0.345 3.431 0.886
HER2 status Positive versus negative 3.636 1.606 8.232 0.002 6.482 2.254 18.639 0.001
Ki67 index ⩾20% versus <20% 2.313 0.466 11.471 0.305 1.230 0.171 8.833 0.837

Bold numerals indicate statistical significance.

CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; N stage, nodal stage; OR, odds ratio; PR, progesterone receptor; T stage, tumor stage.