Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;26(8):4344–4356. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15109

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the methods used in creating the four global human influence datasets and their outputs

  Anthromes Global Human Modification Human Footprint Low Impact Areas
Resolution ~5 km 1 km 1 km 1 km
Data year 2015 2016 2009 2015
Type Categorical Continuous Ordinal Categorical
Scaling 6 groups; 19 classes 0–1 (low to high) 0–50 (low to high) 3 classes
Definition Human biomes—‘the globally significant ecological patterns created by sustained interactions between humans and ecosystems’ Ecological condition of lands based on the spatial extent and intensity of human activities Cumulative human pressure on the environment Landscapes with low human densities and impacts, and not primarily managed for human needs
Primary stressor datasets 6 (human population density, built‐up area, cropland, rice area, irrigated area, pasture) 13 (human population density, built‐up area, cropland, livestock, major roads, minor roads, two tracks, railroads, mines, oil wells, wind turbines, power lines, night‐time lights) 8 (human population density, built‐up area, cropland, pasture, major roads, railroads, navigable rivers, night‐time lights) 7 (human population density, built‐up area, cropland, livestock, forest cover change, roads [in very low impact class], night‐time lights)
Calculation of spatial extent Classifications based on proportion of total area experiencing the stressor Determined the proportion modified by each stressor per 1 km2 area (values ranged from 0 to 1) Treated each stressor layer as present or absent Treated each stressor layer as present or absent
Indirect effects due to human access N/A N/A Applied a distance decay effect of for roads, navigable waterways and coastlines N/A
Stressor weighting N/A Spatial extent × intensity value, continuous from 0 to 1 Assigned pressure scores from 0 to 10 Equal
Cumulative score N/A Applied fuzzy sum algorithm Summation of cell values N/A