Table.
Evaluation Statement | Responses No. (%) (n = 37) |
---|---|
Overall Training Evaluation | |
I would recommend the training to others | |
Agree/strongly agree | 37 (100) |
Neutral | 0 |
Strongly disagree/disagree | 0 |
The training content was useful to my work | |
Agree/strongly agree | 35 (95) |
Neutral | 2 (5) |
Strongly disagree/disagree | 0 |
Mentor Evaluation | |
I used my mentor for the development of an MMWR submission | |
Agree/strongly agree | 33 (89) |
Neutral | 2 (5) |
Strongly disagree/disagree | 2 (5) |
I value my mentor’s opinion | |
Agree/strongly agree | 35 (95) |
Neutral | 2 (5) |
Strongly disagree/disagree | 0 |
I had adequate time with my mentor | |
Agree/strongly agree | 28 (76) |
Neutral | 6 (14) |
Strongly disagree/disagree | 4 (10) |
My mentor was engaged and involved in my work | |
Agree/strongly agree | 32 (86) |
Neutral | 2 (5) |
Strongly disagree/disagree | 3 (8) |
Abbreviation: MMWR, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
aThe Intensive Writing Training course provided on-the-job scientific writing instruction and mentorship for selected applied epidemiologists working on a manuscript. The course was offered in 2017 and 2018. Each course included 3 webinars, expert mentorship from experienced authors, and a 2-day in-person session.