Table 2.
Confidential enquiries into other health outcomes and their follow‐up studies in the United Kingdom (UK)
Confidential enquiry | Follow‐up study setting | Scope of the study | Method of data collection | Conclusion | Time gap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicides (2001) | NHS in England and Wales | Key service recommendations from the NCISH report (2001) | Survey of service provision which enquired about availability of aspects of service and implementation of certain policies | Of the 12 recommendations, 7.2 per service were implemented by 2006 | 5 y since the publication31 |
National Confidential Enquiry—Acute Kidney Injury (2009) | All adult intensive care units in UK | Whether NCEPOD report was influential to their practice | Online survey | Low level of nephrologists’ input in intensive care units in UK | A few months since the publication of the report32 |
National Confidential Enquiry into Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage | All neurosurgical units in UK and Ireland | Key recommendations from the report and two other guidelines | A telephone interview with a registrar working on the ward | In majority of centres, recommendations were currently in practice. There were significant improvements in care | 6 mo after publication of report33 |
National Confidential Enquiry into Parenteral Nutrition (2010) | Hospitals of Northern Nutrition Network in UK | Care of patients on parenteral nutrition | A simplified version of the audit tool used by NCEPOD inquiry team | Improved practice | 3 y after the publication45 |
National Confidential Enquiry into Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2004) | District general hospitals in North East England | Key recommendations from the NCEPOD report | A questionnaire to all patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during 3‐month study period | Good adherence to key recommendations | 5 y after publication of report46 |