Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 9;107(6):895–909. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1479

Table 1.

Ordinal‐level summary sampling table for the 9k‐tip and 20k‐tip rosid sampling compared to the rosid clade of the Open Tree Taxonomy (OTT) database version 3.0 (https://devtree.opentreeoflife.org/about/taxonomy‐version/ott3.0; Hinchliff et al., 2015) and matching taxon names between these data sets. Orders follow APG IV (2016). A summary table at the family level for the 20k‐tip tree is available in Sun et al. (2019).

Order 9k‐tip Tree 20k‐tip Tree
Matched genus (%) Matched species (%) Matched genus (%) Matched species (%)
Brassicales 36.85 7.49 71.12 28.50
Celastrales 59.45 13.34 61.26 18.15
Crossosomatales 92.85 29.26 92.86 29.27
Cucurbitales 85.71 13.93 87.97 26.60
Fabales 66.66 8.25 76.04 21.95
Fagales 44.59 10.91 48.65 21.92
Geraniales 60.00 12.16 75.00 30.67
Huerteales 100.00 23.33 100.00 23.33
Malpighiales 64.98 8.33 65.77 17.37
Malvales 54.81 9.72 62.96 16.54
Myrtales 48.21 4.05 54.11 8.28
Oxalidales 59.42 4.21 62.32 8.25
Picramniales 66.66 8.77 66.67 8.77
Rosales 54.03 3.38 60.45 8.22
Sapindales 56.98 11.21 62.07 18.34
Vitales 60.00 3.63 60.00 9.52
Zygophyllales 62.96 10.58 66.67 17.65
Total 57.80 7.28 66.34 16.25