Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;183(1):146–154. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18604

Table 3.

Diagnostic accuracy and agreement with reference standard (n = 1601 raters)

Mean (95% CI) Median (IQR) 2·5th–97·5th percentile
Po a 0·79 (0·79–0·80) 0·83 (0·75–0·88) 0·42–0·96
Ptype 1 b 0·86 (0·85–0·86) 0·89 (0·80–0·94) 0·43–1·00
Ptype 2 b 0·75 (0·74–0·75) 0·78 (0·67–0·88) 0·31–0·94
Ptype 3 b 0·76 (0·76–0·77) 0·80 (0·71–0·88) 0·32–1·00
Type 1 vs. 2+3
Sensitivity 0·88 (0·87–0·88) 0·88 (0·88–1·00) 0·38–1·00
Specificity 0·92 (0·92–0·93) 0·94 (0·88–1·00) 0·69–1·00
Type 2 vs. 1+3
Sensitivity 0·77 (0·76–0·77) 0·75 (0·62–0·88) 0·25–1·00
Specificity 0·86 (0·86–0·87) 0·88 (0·81–0·94) 0·56–1·00
Type 3 vs. 1+2
Sensitivity 0·74 (0·73–0·75) 0·75 (0·62–0·88) 0·25–1·00
Specificity 0·91 (0·90–0·91) 0·94 (0·88–1·00) 0·62–1·00

CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; type 1, no skin/flap loss; type 2, partial skin/flap loss; type 3, total skin/flap loss. aOverall proportion of agreement; bproportion of specific agreement.