. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Aug;88(8):786–797. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000499

Table 2:

Model Fit Statistics

	χ²			RMSEA		CFI	TLI	SRMR
Outcome (Mediator)	value	df	p	value	90% CI
SIGH-SAD
Model 1 (MEQ)	67.028	44	.0142	.054	[.025, .079]	.975	0.968	.059
Model 2 (SBQ)	97.551	44	<.0001	.083	[.061, .105]	.919	0.899	.072
Model 3 (DAS)	78.076	44	.0012	.066	[.041, .090]	.950	0.938	.066
BDI-II
Model 1 (MEQ)	20.305	11	.0413	.069	[.014, .116]	.986	0.973	.037
Model 2 (SBQ)	38.702	11	<.0001	.119	[.080, .161]	.930	0.866	.069
Model 3 (DAS)	29.278	11	.0021	.097	[.055, .140]	.960	0.923	.042

Note: See Table 1 for outcome measure abbreviations.