Table 5.
(1) | (2) | (3) | |
---|---|---|---|
Years of education in 1940 | |||
Polio * Age-specific infection risk | -0.064 | ||
(0.124) | (0.107) | (0.125) | |
Birth year cohort FE | Yes | Yes | Yes |
State 1940 FE | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Birth state FE | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Birth state trend | No | Yes | No |
1916 Economic controls | No | No | Yes |
Cohort schooling laws | No | No | Yes |
Reference cohort | 1895–98 | 1895–98 | 1895–98 |
N | 166,613 | 166,613 | 166,555 |
Adj | 0.079 | 0.080 | 0.079 |
Results reported are for white males. Sample is restricted to individuals residing in the same state as their state of birth. Years of education are top coded at 17 years. Polio is interacted with polio-specific age-specific infection risk from Boston, MA in 1916 (Dauer 1938). Persons ages 0 to 4 in 1916 are assigned an infection risk of 68%, persons ages 5 to 9 are assigned a risk of 20%, person ages 10 to 19 are assigned a risk of 8% and persons older that 19 are assigned an infection risk of 4%. The average infection risk in the sample is 26.9% and has a standard deviation of 25.6%. Standard errors are clustered by county of residence in 1940 and are in parentheses. All specifications include county of residence in 1940 FE and birth year FE. 1916 Economic Controls are controls interacted with age cohort dummies. These variables include 1916 state level doctors per capita, education expenditures per capita, log manufacturing wages per earner, and log population. Cohort Schooling Laws included proxies for the age of school entry, age of school exit, and age of work permit that varies by state of birth and by year of birth.
, ,