Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;190:109995. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109995

Table 3.

Results of path analysis and post-analysis model criteria.

Hypothesis Hypothesized path PC t-ratio Decision Driver/Barrier VIF f2 R2 Q2
H1 RP → IAEP 0.458a 2.69 Supported Driver 1.625 0.316 0.713 0.446
H2 EPK → IAEP 0.401a 2.83 Supported Driver 1.283 0.277
H3 ATEP → IAEP 0.205a 2.15 Supported Driver 3.081 0.141
H4 PFEP → IAEP −0.291a 2.42 Supported Barrier 2.156 0.201
H5 PBC → IAEP 0.343a 3.10 Supported Driver 3.459 0.237
H6 SBN → IAEP 0.321a 2.95 Supported Driver 1.923 0.221
H7 MNS → IAEP 0.102 1.16 Not supported Neutral 2.384 0.070
H8 RA → IAEP 0.367a 3.11 Supported Driver 2.779 0.253
H9 GGEP → IAEP 0.574a 2.78 Supported Driver 4.142 0.396

Notes: PC: path coefficient

a

p < 0.05.