Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(8):865–873. doi: 10.1002/jso.21945

TABLE I.

Prognostication of GIST of Different Sites by Tumor Size and Mitotic Rate Based on Follow-Up Studies of Over >1,700 GISTs Prior to Imatinib

Tumor parameters Percentage of patients with progressive disease during long-term follow-up and quantitative characterization of the risk for metastasis
Group Size Mitotic rate Gastric GISTs Small intestinal GISTs Duodenal GISTs Rectal GISTs
1 ≤2 cm ≤5/50 HPFs 0 none
2 >2 ≤ 5 cm 1.9 very low 4.3 low 8.3 low 8.5 low
3a >5 ≤ 10 cm 3.6 low 24 moderate 34 higha 57 higha
3b >10 cm 12 moderate 52 high
4 ≤2 cm >5/50 HPFs 0a 50a b 54 high
5 >2 ≤ 5 cm 16 moderate 73 high 50 high 52 high
6a >5 ≤ 10 cm 55 high 85 high 86 higha 71 higha
6b >10 cm 86 high 90 high

Table adopted from Miettinen and Lasota. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1466–1478.

HPF, high power field. 50 high power fields equal here approximately 5 mm2.

a

Small number of cases. Groups combined or prognostic prediction less certain.

b

No tumors encountered with these parameters.