Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2018 Oct 19;78:41–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.10.011

Table A1.

Effects of state unionization on weekly wages for fulltime, nonunion workers in the public sector, GLM models, 1977-2015

Men Women
State-level measures
Public sector unionization .314*** (.077) .290*** (.066)
Private sector unionization .295 (.204) .409* (.200)
Proportion of workforce in public sector .442 (.232) .444 (.252)
Lagged employment rate .179 (.592) −.041 (.527)
GDP .058*** (.015) .052*** (.012)
GDP growth −.179*** (.028) −.116** (.039)
Proportion with at least a BA 1.019*** (.186) 1.042*** (.169)
Risk of automation .152* (.067) .097 (.068)
Proportion in manufacturing −.140 (.163) −.034 (.189)
Individual-level controls
Race (ref.=white)
 Black −.136*** (.014) −.056*** (.013)
 Hispanic −.080*** (.021) −.073*** (.015)
 Other −.033* (.016) .003 (.017)
 Missing −.020 (.017) .002 (.013)
Experience .046*** (.001) .026*** (.001)
Experience squared −.001*** (.000) −.000*** (.000)
Education (ref.=less than HS)
 HS .140*** (.006) 118*** (.010)
 Some college .232*** (.008) .188*** (.012)
 At least 4 years of college .476*** (.013) .455*** (.013)
Hours worked per week .015*** (.000) .022*** (.001)
Metro (ref.=in city)
 In rest of SMSA −.145*** (.009) −.131*** (.009)
 Not in SMSA −.097*** (.013) −.092*** (.016)
Region (ref.=northeast)
 North central .037 (.024) .035 (.025)
 South .090*** (.028) 110*** (.030)
 West 109*** (.025) 104*** (.026)
Intercept 4.274*** (.595s) 4.438*** (.573)
N 150,829 188,010
Number of parameters 86 86
AIC 15.753 15.190

Notes: Results provide GLM estimates of models in Table 2. Robust standard errors clustered by state are in parentheses. All models also include year and occupation fixed-effects. Statistical significance (two-tailed tests) is indicated by:

***

p<.001,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05.