Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2018 Oct 19;78:41–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.10.011

Table A2.

Effects of state unionization on weekly wages for fulltime, nonunion workers in the private sector, GLM models, 1977-2015

Men Women
State-level measures
Public sector unionization .052 (.046) .137** (.048)
Private sector unionization .352* (.144) .162 (.143)
Proportion of workforce in public sector −.305 (.178) −.366 (.199)
Lagged employment rate −.211 (.246) −.335 (.280)
GDP .080*** (.011) .064*** (.012)
GDP growth −.184*** (.026) −.128*** (.021)
Proportion with at least a BA .695*** (.125) .866*** (.124)
Risk of automation .187*** (.046) .065 (.053)
Proportion in manufacturing −.191 (.119) −.004 (.136)
Individual-level controls
Race (ref.=white)
 Black −.172*** (.006) −.080*** (.007)
 Hispanic −.197*** (.014) −.135*** (.014)
 Other −.090*** (.009) −.049*** (.008)
 Missing −.016** (.006) −.004 (.011)
Experience .041*** (.001) .026*** (.000)
Experience squared −.001*** (.000) −.000*** (.000)
Education (ref.=less than HS)
 HS .154*** (.006) .134*** (.008)
 Some college .260*** (.008) .241*** (.010)
 At least 4 years of college .551*** (.010) .506*** (.012)
Hours worked per week .021*** (.000) .028*** (.000)
Metro (ref.=in city)
 In rest of SMSA −.096*** (.007) −.130*** (.007)
 Not in SMSA −.036** (.013) −.092***(.012)
Region (ref.=northeast)
 North central −.006 (.016) −.009 (.014)
 South .029 (.018) .030 (.018)
 West .065*** (.016) .058*** (.017)
Intercept 4.694*** (.267s) 4.888*** (.294)
N 1,202,178 1,033,069
Number of parameters 86 86
AIC 15.486 14.878

Notes: Results provide GLM estimates of models in Table 3. Robust standard errors clustered by state are in parentheses. All models also include year and occupation fixed-effects. Statistical significance (two-tailed tests) is indicated by:

***

p<.001

**

p<.01

*

p<.05.