Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 17;2(1):26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.02.016

Table 2.

Differences, Derived by LSM (95% Confidence Intervals), of Centrally Quantified Echocardiographic Parameters Between Cases and Control Subjects as a Function of Time Prior to the Index Time Point (i.e., Cardiomyopathy Diagnosis)

≥6 Yrs Prior to Index 4 to <6 Yrs Prior to Index 2 to <4 Yrs Prior to Index <2 Yrs Prior to Index Index Timepoint All Times Prior to Index >2 Yrs Prior to Index
LV systolic function
 2D-derived FS, % 4.0 (1.2 to 6.7)
p = 0.005
3.1 (0.7 to 5.5)
p = 0.013
2.8 (0.7 to 4.8)
p = 0.008
3.0 (1.0 to 4.8)
p = 0.003
8.4 (6.7 to 10.1)
p < 0.001
3.2 (1.9 to 4.5)
p < 0.001
3.3 (1.7 to 4.8)
p < 0.001
 Biplane EF, % 2.8 (−3.2 to 8.8)
p = 0.364
2.8 (−1.4 to 7.0)
p = 0.194
4.8 (1.5 to 8.1)
p = 0.006
4.6 (1.6 to 7.6)
p = 0.004
12.4 (9.8 to 15.0)
p < 0.001
3.7 (1.3 to 6.1)
p = 0.003
3.5 (0.5 to 6.4)
p = 0.023
 Mitral Sʹ TDI, m/s −0.005 (−0.025 to 0.015)
p = 0.602
0.003 (−0.013 to 0.019)
p = 0.700
0.007 (−0.007 to 0.021)
p = 0.316
0.007 (−0.004 to 0.018)
p = 0.193
0.027 (0.017 to 0.038)
p < 0.001
0.003 (−0.005 to 0.011)
p = 0.469
0.002 (−0.009 to 0.012)
p = 0.745
 Septal Sʹ TDI, m/s −0.005 (−0.014 to 0.003)
p = 0.234
0.003 (−0.004 to 0.010)
p = 0.406
0.003 (−0.004 to 0.009)
p = 0.421
−0.003 (−0.008 to 0.003)
p = 0.366
0.012 (0.007 to 0.017)
p < 0.001
−0.001 (−0.004 to 0.003)
p = 0.778
0.000 (−0.004 to 0.005)
p = 0.952
LV diastolic function
 Mitral PW E/A ratio 0.59 (0.21 to 0.96)
p = 0.002
0.07 (−0.27 to 0.40)
p = 0.699
0.45 (0.16 to 0.74)
p = 0.002
0.24 (−0.02 to 0.50)
p = 0.069
0.56 (0.32 to 0.80)
p < 0.001
0.34 (0.16 to 0.51)
p < 0.001
0.37 (0.16 to 0.58)
p < 0.001
 Mitral Eʹ, m/s 0.014 (−0.018 to 0.046);
p = 0.405
0.004 (−0.022 to 0.029)
p = 0.784
0.013 (−0.010 to 0.036)
p = 0.268
−0.001 (−0.017 to 0.016)
p = 0.930
0.045 (0.029 to 0.061)
p < 0.001
0.007 (−0.007 to 0.021)
p = 0.307
0.010 (−0.007 to 0.027)
p = 0.257
 Mitral E/Eʹ ratio 0.10 (−1.62 to 1.81)
p = 0.913
−0.38 (−1.69 to 0.93)
p = 0.567
0.06 (−1.23 to 1.35)
p = 0.927
−0.26 (−1.15 to 0.62)
p = 0.560
−0.77 (−1.63 to 0.08)
p = 0.078
−0.12 (−0.92 to 0.67)
p = 0.762
−0.08 (−1.04 to 0.89)
p = 0.878
 Septal Eʹ TDI, m/s −0.018 (−0.035 to −0.002)
p = 0.032
0.010 (−0.004 to 0.023)
p = 0.150
0.008 (−0.004 to 0.021)
p = 0.192
−0.002 (−0.013−0.009)
p = 0.751
0.018 (0.009 to 0.028)
p < 0.001
0.000 (−0.008 to 0.007)
p = 0.918
0.000 (−0.009 to 0.009)
p = 0.991
 Septal E/Eʹ ratio 1.74 (0.33 to 3.16)
p = 0.016
−0.46 (−1.61 to 0.69)
p = 0.431
−0.26 (−1.35 to 0.83)
p = 0.639
−0.16 (−1.09 to 0.76)
p = 0.729
−0.07 (−0.90 to 0.76)
p = 0.867
0.21 (−0.46 to 0.89)
p = 0.533
0.34 (−0.47 to 1.15)
p = 0.413
LV combined systolic/diastolic function
 PW Doppler-derived MPI 0.006 (−0.036 to 0.048)
p = 0.788
−0.030 (−0.065 to 0.004)
p = 0.088
−0.032 (−0.064 to 0.001)
p = 0.055
−0.026 (−0.055 to 0.003)
p = 0.084
−0.061 (−0.088 to −0.034)
p < 0.001
−0.021 (−0.039 to −0.003)
p = 0.026
−0.019 (−0.041 to 0.003)
p = 0.093
 TDI-derived MPI 0.020 (−0.043 to 0.084)
p = 0.536
−0.042 (−0.091 to 0.008)
p = 0.100
−0.032 (−0.075 to 0.011)
p = 0.144
0.001 (−0.041 to 0.043)
p = 0.962
−0.063 (−0.101 to −0.026)
p = 0.001
−0.013 (−0.042 to 0.016)
p = 0.374
−0.018 (−0.053 to 0.017)
p = 0.314
LV size and geometry
 Posterior wall thickness, z-score −0.26 (−0.81 to 0.30)
p = 0.364
−0.11 (−0.58 to 0.35)
p = 0.628
−0.16 (−0.57 to 0.25)
p = 0.437
−0.03 (−0.39 to 0.33)
p = 0.867
0.10 (−0.21 to 0.41)
p = 0.532
−0.14 (−0.42 to 0.14)
p = 0.330
−0.18 (−0.52 to 0.16)
p = 0.305
 End-diastolic dimension, z-score −0.28 (−1.04 to 0.47)
p = 0.462
−0.87 (−1.49 to −0.25)
p = 0.006
−1.09 (−1.64 to −0.55)
p < 0.001
−0.81 (−1.31 to −0.32)
p = 0.001
−1.18 (−1.62 to −0.74)
p < 0.001
−0.77 (−1.19 to −0.34)
p < 0.001
−0.75 (−1.24 to −0.26)
p = 0.003
 Thickness to dimension ratio −0.001 (−0.016 to 0.014)
p = 0.864
0.005 (−0.008 to 0.018)
p = 0.439
0.005 (−0.005 to 0.016)
p = 0.321
0.006 (−0.004 to 0.016)
p = 0.231
0.013 (0.004 to 0.022)
p = 0.004
0.004 (−0.004 to 0.011)
p = 0.323
0.003 (−0.006 to 0.012)
p = 0.507

2D = 2-dimensional; EF = ejection fraction; FS = fractional shortening; LSM = least square means; LV = left ventricular; MPI = myocardial performance index; PW = pulsed wave Doppler derived; TDI = tissue Doppler imaging.

Differences were based on comparisons of LSMs from longitudinal mixed models for each measure, including an interaction between case status and time period, using an autoregressive correlation structure between echocardiograms for the same patient. For example, at the index time point, the estimated FS is 8.4% greater in control subjects compared with cases; at the <2-year time point, the estimated FS is 3.0% greater in control subjects compared with cases.