Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 17;2(1):26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.02.016

Table 3.

Estimates, Derived by LSM of Centrally Quantified Echocardiographic Parameters for Cases and Control Subjects During 3 Time Periods: at the Time of Cancer Diagnosis; While on Cancer Therapy, and After Therapy up to and Including the Time of the Index Case Echocardiogram

Case
Control
p Value
n Echo Time Points, n LSM Estimate (95% CI) n Echo Time Points, n LSM Estimate (95% CI)
2D-derived FS, %
 At cancer diagnosis 15 15 31 (29 to 33) 11 11 35 (33 to 38) 0.010
 On therapy 22 44 27 (26 to 29) 14 3 34 (32 to 35) <0.001
 Post-therapy 37 121 26 (25 to 27) 50 181 31 (30 to 32) <0.001
Biplane EF, %
 At cancer diagnosis 6 6 62 (57 to 66) 3 3 64 (58 to 70) 0.523
 On therapy 10 13 55 (52 to 59) 7 15 64 (61 to 68) <0.001
 Post-therapy 28 67 55 (53 to 56) 41 99 63 (61 to 64) <0.001
Mitral PW E/A ratio
 At cancer diagnosis 13 13 1.61 (1.28 to 1.94) 9 9 2.14 (1.75 to 2.53) 0.035
 On therapy 18 34 1.65 (1.42 to 1.88) 13 33 1.78 (1.53 to 2.02) 0.419
 Post-therapy 37 114 1.84 (1.69 to 1.99) 50 170 2.24 (2.12 to 2.37) <0.001
PW Doppler-derived MPI
 At cancer diagnosis 9 9 0.32 (0.28 to 0.36) 9 9 0.29 (0.25 to 0.33) 0.247
 On therapy 14 26 0.33 (0.31 to 0.36) 13 32 0.29 (0.26 to 0.31) 0.006
 Post-therapy 32 82 0.34 (0.32 to 0.35) 50 159 0.29 (0.28 to 0.30) <0.001
LV end-diastolic dimension, z-score
 At cancer diagnosis 10 10 1.10 (0.54 to 1.67) 6 6 0.34 (−0.32 to 1.00) 0.088
 On therapy 17 33 0.95 (0.53 to 1.38) 14 31 0.10 (−0.33 to 0.53) 0.006
 Post-therapy 36 100 0.66 (0.34 to 0.97) 47 157 −0.11 (−0.39 to 0.17) <0.001
LV thickness-dimension ratio
 At cancer diagnosis 15 15 0.14 (0.13 to 0.15) 11 11 0.15 (0.14 to 0.16) 0.088
 On therapy 22 44 0.13 (0.12 to 0.14) 14 35 0.15 (0.14 to 0.16) 0.003
 Post-therapy 37 121 0.13 (0.13 to 0.14) 50 182 0.14 (0.14 to 0.15) 0.027

Abbreviations as in Table 2.

LSM, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p values for case-control comparisons were from longitudinal mixed models for each measure, including an interaction between case status and time period, and using an autoregressive correlation structure between echocardiograms for the same patient. As an example, the estimated FS is 31% in cases at cancer diagnosis as compared to 35% in controls at cancer diagnosis.