Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2019 May 21;292(1):77–83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182599

Table 2:

Mixed-effects Model with Unstructured Covariance and Time-to-Diagnosis Interactions with Imputed Data (100 Imputed Data Sets)

Linear Mixed-effects Model with Log Transformation of Response
Effect Percent Change* P Value
Final pathology
 Ductal carcinoma in situ 69 (30, 121) <.001
 Benign REF
Time to diagnosis (y) 68 (56, 80) <.001
Age at diagnosis (y) 1.2(0.1,2.2) .03
Breast density
 Fatty −25 (−62, 48) .40
 Scattered fibroglandular −25 (−54, 21) .24
 Heterogeneously dense −24 (−52, 21) .25
 Extremely dense REF
Race
 Black 9.1 (−14,38) .47
 White REF
Time-to-diagnosis interaction
 Ductal carcinoma in situ 17 (0.5, 36) .04
 Benign REF

Note.—Unless otherwise stated, data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. The response variable (long-axis length) was log transformed prior to model fitting. The variance-covariance estimates of the random effects are shown in Appendix E2 (online). REF = reference standard for calculations.

*

For each model coefficient β^ estimated on the log-transformed scale, percent change on the natural scale was calculated as 100(eβ^1).