Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May 7;38:100886. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100886

Table 3:

Covariate Balance before Matching and Using Three Matching Methods

1 2 3 4
Unbalanced Covariates Propensity Score Matching Nearest Neighbor Matching Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjusted

Standardized Difference in Means Variance Ratio Standardized Difference in Means Variance Ratio Standardized Difference in Means Variance Ratio Standardized Difference in Means Variance Ratio
Weekly Sweetened Beverage Consumption −0.27 0.75 0.10 1.33 −0.18 0.76 0.09 1.38
Lives in Seattle 0.36 0.98 −0.02 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 1.00
High Income (≥ 260% FPL) −0.16 1.02 0.02 1.00 −0.01 1.00 −0.01 1.00
Non-Hispanic White 0.05 0.95 0.08 0.91 0.05 0.95 0.06 0.94
Non-Hispanic Black −0.05 0.86 −0.04 0.87 −0.02 0.93 −0.06 0.83
Non-Hispanic Asian −0.30 0.37 −0.11 0.69 −0.05 0.85 −0.06 0.83
Hispanic 0.09 1.25 0.05 1.13 0.02 1.05 0.02 1.06
50 or Younger −0.54 1.03 −0.04 1.00 −0.07 1.01 −0.01 1.00
Completed College or Above −0.09 1.04 0.00 1.00 0.03 0.98 0.00 1.00
Married or Partnered −0.07 1.00 −0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 −0.02 1.00
Democrat 0.12 1.00 −0.04 0.99 0.00 1.00 −0.02 1.00
Independent −0.02 0.98 0.02 1.02 −0.01 0.99 0.03 1.03

Note: Standardized difference in means is phone mean response minus web mean response, divided by the standard deviation of the outcomes. Variance ratio is the ratio of the variances in each group. For columns 2-4, the full set of matching variables includes all variables shown, interactions between all variables including squared terms, and interactions between all interactions, including quadrupled terms. We also employ matching on all variables except consumption for the consumption outcome, but these results are not shown. Results are not materially changed in that specification.