Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;44(9):146. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01611-9

Table 2.

Comparative evaluation of cranial defects reconstruction techniques (weighted scores within rounded squares)

Evaluation metrics Weight Mirroring Thin-plate spline deformation (TPS) Free-form modelling Template-based Snake
Defect site 0.00 3 (0.00) 9 (0.00) 9 (0.00) 9 (0.00) 9 (0.00)
Defect size 0.20 6 (1.20) 3 (0.60) 6 (1.20) 9 (1.80) 6 (1.20)
Degree of skull asymmetry 0.20 3 (0.60) 9 (1.80) 6 (1.20) 9 (1.80) 6 (1.20)
Set-up required 0.10 3 (0.30) 3 (0.30) 9 (0.90) 3 (0.30) 6 (0.60)
User intervention 0.05 6 (0.30) 3 (0.15) 3 (0.15) 3 (0.15) 9 (0.45)
Operational time 0.05 6 (0.30) 3 (0.15) 3 (0.15) 6 (0.30) 9 (0.45)
Skills 0.10 6 (0.60) 6 (0.60) 3 (0.30) 6 (0.60) 6 (0.60)
Quality

  Curvature

Tangency

Continuity

0.10

0.10

0.10

9 (0.90)

3 (0.30)

3 (0.30)

3 (0.30)

9 (0.90)

9 (0.90)

6 (0.60)

9 (0.90)

9 (0.90)

9 (0.90)

3 (0.30)

3 (0.30)

3 (0.30)

3 (0.30)

9 (0.90

Total score 1.00 48 (4.80) 57 (5.70) 63 (6.30) 60 (6.45) 66 (6.00)