Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;10:12542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69482-1

Table 3.

Performance using T scores by cognitive domains for each level of cognitive impairment. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. T-score was a standard score Z shifted and scaled to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores are consistent with better performance on all cognitive domains.

Domains All (n = 613) Cognitive impairment pa
Non (n = 117) Mild (n = 228) Major (n = 268)
Memory 50.00 ± 6.46 55.21 ± 5.12b 51.63 ± 5.24b 46.33 ± 5.77b < 0.001
Attention/processing speed 50.00 ± 8.82 57.64 ± 4.84b 53.46 ± 5.21b 43.72 ± 8.33b < 0.001
Executive function 50.00 ± 7.21 55.71 ± 3.47b 53.10 ± 3.89b 44.87 ± 7.24b < 0.001
Language 50.00 ± 8.13 54.29 ± 5.83b 52.53 ± 6.27b 45.98 ± 8.57b < 0.001
Visuospatial function 50.00 ± 10.00 56.33 ± 2.19c 55.41 ± 2.83c 42.64 ± 11.11b < 0.001

ap value for one-way ANOVA F test, the null hypothesis is that mean values are equal for all 3 cognitive groups.

bDesignate significant difference from any other cognitive group values in the same row (after least significant difference (LSD) adjustment for multiple comparisons).

cDesignate nonsignificant differences in the visuospatial function domain between the non- and mild cognitive impairment groups (p = 0.288).