TABLE 1.
Results of confirmatory factor analysis of the measurement models (N = 251).
| Measurement Models | χ 2(df) | Δχ 2(Δ df) | CFI | IFI | TLI | RMSEA |
| Model 1: Four-factor | 463.86 (183)** | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.08 | |
| Model 2: Three-factor (combined CCB and negative affect into one factor) | 655.65 (186)** | 191.79 (3)** | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.10 |
| Model 3: Three-factor (combined CSE and employee creativity into one factor) | 564.08 (186)** | 100.22 (3)** | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.09 |
| Model 4: Two-factor (combined CCB and negative affect into one factor, and combined CSE and employee creativity into one factor) | 754.38 (188)** | 290.52 (5)** | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.11 |
| Model 5: One-factor (combined all items into one factor) | 1,099.50 (189)** | 635.64 (6)** | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.14 |
CFI, comparative fit index; IFI, incremental fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; CCB, compulsory citizenship behavior; CSE, creative self-efficacy. CCB and negative affect were measured at Time-1; CSE and employee creativity were measured at Time-2. All alternative models were compared with the four-factor model; **p < 0.01.