Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;11:1640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01640

TABLE 1.

Results of confirmatory factor analysis of the measurement models (N = 251).

Measurement Models χ 2(df) Δχ 2df) CFI IFI TLI RMSEA
Model 1: Four-factor 463.86 (183)** 0.91 0.92 0.89 0.08
Model 2: Three-factor (combined CCB and negative affect into one factor) 655.65 (186)** 191.79 (3)** 0.69 0.69 0.65 0.10
Model 3: Three-factor (combined CSE and employee creativity into one factor) 564.08 (186)** 100.22 (3)** 0.75 0.75 0.72 0.09
Model 4: Two-factor (combined CCB and negative affect into one factor, and combined CSE and employee creativity into one factor) 754.38 (188)** 290.52 (5)** 0.62 0.63 0.58 0.11
Model 5: One-factor (combined all items into one factor) 1,099.50 (189)** 635.64 (6)** 0.39 0.40 0.32 0.14

CFI, comparative fit index; IFI, incremental fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; CCB, compulsory citizenship behavior; CSE, creative self-efficacy. CCB and negative affect were measured at Time-1; CSE and employee creativity were measured at Time-2. All alternative models were compared with the four-factor model; **p < 0.01.