Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;7:459. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00459

Table 5.

Meta-analysis of imaging findings.

CT Scan Patterns Pooled frequency n/N* Publication bias Heterogeneity test
(95% CI) (p-value) I2 (%) p-value
Location of involvement Number of affected lobe Unaffected 20.7 (15.1–27.6) 33/161 0.18 0.0 0.57
1 lobe 14.8 (7.4–24.0) 52/318 0.22 73 0.00
2 lobes 9.5 (6.5–12.8) 30/318 0.32 0.0 0.50
3 lobes 11.7 (7.9–14.6) 36/318 0.64 0.0 0.50
4 lobes 15.8 (10.3–20.7) 49/318 0.90 40 0.15
5 lobes 37.2 (32.0–42.3) 118/318 0.50 30 0.22
Affected lobe (s) RUL 56.8 (50.6–62.8) 145/255 0.12 52 0.10
RML 48.6 (42.5–54.8) 124/255 0.07 0.0 0.48
RLL 76.2 (65.5–84.4) 193/255 0.14 64 0.03
LUL 56.0 (47.1–64.7) 153/255 0.12 0.0 0.40
LLL 71.8 (57.8–82.5) 167/234 0.30 76 0.01
Laterality Uni lateral 28.8 (16.6–45.2) 62/205 0.80 77 0.01
Bi lateral 70.6 (55.3–82.5) 142/205 0.20 74 0.01
Pattern of involvement Pattern of involvement No involvement 17.2 (11.4–25.0) 193/1,080 0.42 63.0 0.04
Both of GGO* & consolidation 39.0 (28.1–51.0) 57/142 NA 25 0.24
GGO without consolidation 66.0 (51.1–78.0) 846/1,365 0.67 90 0.00
Consolidation without GGO 9.4 (3.3–23.6) 26/274 0.21 82 0.00
Laterality Uni lateral 21.8 (12.0–36.3) 101/507 0.63 87 0.00
Bi lateral 74.8 (62.5–84.0) 405/548 0.29 84 0.00
*

GGO, Ground Glass Opacities.