Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;11:1071. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01071

Table 3.

ANOVA on the effect of treatment (E), subpopulation (G), and the treatment x subpopulation interaction (E×G) on normalized tuber starch yield in pot, big-bag and field trials.

Trial-Id Df F(E) p(E) F(G) p (G) F(E×G) p(E×G)
B2 308 223.822 <0.0001 0.34 0.7123 7.892 0.0005
P3 231 2105.94 <0.0001 1.51 0.2232 5.408 0.0051
B4 703 2940.21 <0.0001 4.776 0.0087 0.249 0.7798
P5 699 8820.39 <0.0001 0.933 0.3940 3.153 0.0433
B6 705 1842.26 <0.0001 6.585 0.0015 1.395 0.2486
P7 676 11372.3 <0.0001 2.306 0.1000 0.817 0.4420
F1 114 1.917 0.169 0.455 0.6350 0.181 0.8350
F2 227 346.7 <0.0001 0.224 0.8000 1.483 0.2290
F3 341 1553.22 <0.0001 7.071 0.0010 4.635 0.0103
F4 221 365.873 <0.0001 0.438 0.6460 0.054 0.9480
F5 220 35.313 <0.0001 0.184 0.8320 0.579 0.5610
F6 351 1924.41 <0.0001 1.725 0.1800 0.919 0.4000
F7 211 1012.94 <0.0001 0.452 0.6370 0.624 0.5370
F8 216 43.889 <0.0001 3.319 0.0380 0.266 0.7670

Df, degrees of freedom for the model error; F, F statistic; p, probability (in bold when p < 0.05).