Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;11:1116. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01116

Table 2.

Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) of the effects of species (Schiedea kaalae or S. hookeri) and time of day on floral scent composition. (A) ANOVA-like permutation test (n = 99999 iterations) of each term. (B) Compound scores on the first CAP axis, which discriminated between the species. Absolute scores ≥ 0.02 are included. Negative values indicate compounds associated with S. hookeri, and positive values indicate compounds associated with S. kaalae.

(A) Test of CAP model
df SS F P
Species 1 6.74 52.7 0.00001
Time 1 0.61 4.8 0.00146
Species : Time 1 0.37 2.9 0.02012
Residual 72 9.20
(B) Compounds separating species
Name CAP1 Score
S. hookeri
unknown benzenoid -0.09
indole -0.08
(E)-hex-2-enal -0.07
(E)-hex-3-enal -0.06
methyl 2-aminobenzoate -0.06
heptane-2,3-dione -0.06
1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran -0.06
benzaldehyde -0.05
(3E)-4,8-dimethylnona-1,3,7-triene -0.05
3,5,5-trimethylhex-2-ene -0.04
anisole -0.02
N-phenylformamide -0.02
furan-3-ylmethanol -0.02
2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexane-1,4-dione 0.06
oct-1-en-3-ol 0.06
4-oxoisophorone 0.09
α-phellandrene 0.12
2-phenylacetaldehyde 0.12
linalool oxide (furanoid) 0.43
linalool oxide (pyranoid) 0.59
linalool oxide (pyranoid) ketone 0.62
S. kaalae