Table 2.

Sensitivity analysis of pooled prevalence of FGM for each study being removed one at a time.

Study Omitted	FGM Pooled prevalence (95% CI)
Olijira T et al./2016	77.16(54.87,99.45)
Tamire M et al./2013	77.01(54.74,99.29)
Bogale D et al./2014	77.22(54.99,99.45)
Shay TZ et al./2010	80.13(57.96,102.30)
Yirga WS et al./2012	76.45(54.14,98.76)
Abdisa B et al./2017	76.74(54.58,98.90)
Gebremariam K et al./2016	76.99(54.74,99.23)
Shiferaw D et al./2017	77.26(54.99,99.52)
Degefa H et al./2017	76.46(54.27,98.64)
Andualem M/2013	77.26(55.00,99.52)
Andualem M/2016	76.24(53.99,98.50)
Chuluko BG et al./2018	76.53(54.24,98.82)
Belda SS et al./2017	78.04(55.78,100.30)
Gudu W et al./2017	76.48(54.35,98.62)
Hussein MA et al./2013	76.58(54.42,98.74)
Gajaa M et al./2016	76.12(54.15,98.09)
Gebrekirstos K et al./2014	81.58(74.43,88.74)
Argaw A et al./2002	76.22(54.10,98.34)
EDHS/2016	77.97(53.87,66.06)