Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;9(3):100477. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the included studies.

Authors [ref] Sample Size (T/C) Type of patients Age(years) T/ C Course of disease (days)T/C Intervention Course of Treatment (days) Outcome Adverse events
Ding 24 100(51/49)mild ordinary severe 54.7 ± 21.3/50.8 ± 23.5 5.3 ± 3.1/6.0 ± 3.7 Qingfei touxie fuzheng decoction + WM* vs. WM 10 (1) Defervescence rate; (2) Cough resolution rate; (3) Tachypnea resolution rate; (4) Diarrhea resolution rate; (6) Adverse event Abnormal liver function (T:2;C:3)
Duan 25 123(82/41)mild 52.0 ± 13.9/50.3 ± 13.2 2.7 ± 1.6/2.5 ± 1.5 Jinhua qinggan granules + WM vs. WM 5 (1) Clinical symptoms score; (2) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (3) Defervescence rate (4) Cough resolution rate; (5) Fatigue resolution rate; (6) Diarrhea resolution rate; (7) Body pain resolution rate; (8) Adverse event Gastrointestinal reaction (T:27)
Fu_a26 73(37/36)
ordinary
45.3 ± 7.3/44.7 ± 7.5 7.6 ± 1.3/8.5 ± 1.4 Toujie quwen granules + WM vs. WM 15 (1) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (2) Adverse event NR in details
Fu_b27 65(32/33) mild ordinary 43.3 ± 7.2/43.7 ± 6.5 7.56 ± 1.3/8.5 ± 1.6 Toujie quwen granules + WM vs. WM 10 (1) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (2) Adverse event. NR in details
Hu 28 284(142/142) mild ordinary 50.4 ± 15.2/51.8 ± 14.8 9.5 ± 5.1/9.9 ± 5.9 Lianhua qingwen granules + WM vs. WM 14 (1) Rate of 2019-nCoV RT-PCR turned to negativity; (2) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (3) Adverse event Gastrointestinal reaction (T:24; C:33); Abnormal liver function (T:32;C:32); Renal dysfunction (T:8;C:11); headache (T:1;C:1)
Li 29 12(6/6) severe 52.0 ± 6.6/50.0 ± 10.0 NR/NR Qingfei paidu decoction + WM vs. WM 6 (1) Length of hospital stay; (2) Adverse event Pruritus (T:1)
Qiu 30 50(25/25) ordinary 53.4 ± 18.4/51.3 ± 14.6 2.8 ± 0.8/3.2 ± 1.3 Maxing Xuanfei Jiedu Decoction + WM vs. WM 10 (1) Clinical symptoms score; (2) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (3) Defervescence time (4) Cough resolution time Not assessed
Sun 31 57(32/25) NR 45.4 ± 14.1/42.0 ± 11.7 4.4 ± 2.5/6.0 ± 4.4 Lianhua qingke granules + WM vs. WM 14 (1) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (2) Defervescence rate; (3) Cough resolution rate; (4) Fatigue resolution rate Not assessed
Xiao 32 200(100/100) mild 60.9 ± 8.7/62.2 ± 7.5 5.5 ± 2.09/6.4 ± 3.0 Sufeng jiedu capsule + WM vs. WM 14 (1) Defervescence time; (2) Cough resolution time; (3) Fatigue resolution time; (4) Adverse event Gastrointestinal reaction (T:2;C:1); Pruritus (T:1; C:2)
Ye33 42(28/14) severe 65 (53.5–69)/59 (47–67) NR/NR Chinese herbal medicine + WM vs. WM 7 (1)Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (2) All-cause death Not assessed
Yu 34 295(147/148) mild ordinary 48.3 ± 9.6/47.3 ± 8.7 NR/NR Lianhua qingwen granules + WM vs. WM 7 (1) Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical; (2) All-cause death; (3) Adverse event NR in details

T, Treatment group/Experimental group; C, control group; NR, not reported; WM, western medicine; * Western medicine includes antibacterial, antiviral, hormone therapy, respiratory support, etc.