Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;9(3):100477. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477

Table 3.

Summary of findings.

Chinese medical drug and western medicine compared to western medicine for coronavirus disease 2019
Patient or population: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 Intervention: CHM + WM Comparison: WM
Outcomes No. of participants (studies) Follow up Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Relative effect (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with western medicine Risk difference with Chinese medical drug and western medicine
Number of patients turned to the types of severe and critical 989 (8 RCTs) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a RR 0.47 (0.32 to 0.69) 140 per 1000 74 fewer per 1000 (95 fewer to 43 fewer)
Length of hospital stay 12 (1 RCT) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW a,b MD 7.95 lower (14.66 lower to 1.24 lower)
Defervescence time 250 (2 RCTs) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a,c MD 1.2 lower (2.03 lower to 0.38 lower)
Cough resolution rate 264 (3 RCTs) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW a,b RR 1.37 (1.15–1.64) 523 per 1000 194 more per 1000 (79 more to 335 more)
Fatigue resolution rate 147 (2 RCTs) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW a,b RR 1.37 (1.02–1.83) 431 per 1000 160 more per 1000 (9 more to 358 more)
Tachypnea resolution rate 35 (1 RCT) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW a,b RR 2.20 (1.11–4.39) 353 per 1000 424 more per 1000 (39 more to 1196 more)

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; MD: Mean difference a. Unclear risk of bias b. Small sample size c. High heterogeneity.