Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 27;12(6):277–286. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i6.277

Table 1.

Background factors between the study groups

Group F Group C P value
n 24 32
Age, median (range) 69 (51-82) 66 (39-90) NS
Sex, male/female 18 /6 25/7 NS
BMI, median (range) 23.2 (15.9-28.7) 21.9 (14.6-27.7) NS
Location, U/M/L 2/12/10 5/12/15 NS
Tumor size, mm (mean ± SD) 50.9 ± 31.3 54.6 ± 26.1 NS
McT, 0/1/2/3/4/5 12/0/3/7/1/1 14/1/7/4/3/3 NS
sT factor, 1/2/3/4 8/1/3/12 12/2/8/10 NS
sN factor, 0/1/2/3 9/4/6/5 20/7/3/2 NS
Approach, open/laparoscopic 17/7 27/5 NS
Surgery, DG/TG 22/2 26/6 NS
D number, 1+/2 14/10 19/13 NS
pN factor. 0/1/2/3 8/5/2/9 16/5/7/4 NS

NS: No significance; Group F: Fat dissociation group; Group C: Conventional harvesting group; BMI: Body mass index; McT: Macroscopic type (Borrmann); sT: Surgical diagnosis of depth of invasion; sN: Surgical diagnosis of nodal metastasis; DG: Distal gastrectomy; TG: Total gastrectomy; D number: Degree of lymph node dissection; pN: Pathological diagnosis of nodal metastasis.