Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;8(14):2902–2916. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2902

Table 3.

Determination of the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer by magnifying narrow-band imaging

Ref. Study design Lesion (n) Pathology Diagnostic accuracy P value
Kiyotoki et al[61] Comparative study between CE and M-NBI EGC (70), adenoma (13) ESD 77.8% vs 97.4% 0.009
Marking dots were placed on the tumor margins
Nagahama et al[63] M-NBI for unclear margins by CE EGC (350) ESD 81.1% → 94.8% < 0.001
Uchita et al[64] Combination of CE and M-NBI EGC (161) ESD 72.7% → 98.1% < 0.001
Asada-Hirayama et al[62] Comparative study between CE and M-NBI EGC (109) ESD 75.9% vs 89.4% 0.007
Oral and anal tumor margins of the same lesion
Nagahama et al[66] Comparative study between CE and M-NBI EGC (343) Biopsy 85.7% vs 88.0% 0.63
Biopsies outside and inside the tumor margins
Horii et al[65] Non-comparative study using M-NBI only EGC (330) Biopsy, ESD 96.7%-97.9% N/A

CE: Chromoendoscopy; M-NBI: Magnifying narrow-band imaging; EGC: Early gastric cancer; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; N/A: Not applicable.