Table 3.
Determination of the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer by magnifying narrow-band imaging
| Ref. | Study design | Lesion (n) | Pathology | Diagnostic accuracy | P value |
| Kiyotoki et al[61] | Comparative study between CE and M-NBI | EGC (70), adenoma (13) | ESD | 77.8% vs 97.4% | 0.009 |
| Marking dots were placed on the tumor margins | |||||
| Nagahama et al[63] | M-NBI for unclear margins by CE | EGC (350) | ESD | 81.1% → 94.8% | < 0.001 |
| Uchita et al[64] | Combination of CE and M-NBI | EGC (161) | ESD | 72.7% → 98.1% | < 0.001 |
| Asada-Hirayama et al[62] | Comparative study between CE and M-NBI | EGC (109) | ESD | 75.9% vs 89.4% | 0.007 |
| Oral and anal tumor margins of the same lesion | |||||
| Nagahama et al[66] | Comparative study between CE and M-NBI | EGC (343) | Biopsy | 85.7% vs 88.0% | 0.63 |
| Biopsies outside and inside the tumor margins | |||||
| Horii et al[65] | Non-comparative study using M-NBI only | EGC (330) | Biopsy, ESD | 96.7%-97.9% | N/A |
CE: Chromoendoscopy; M-NBI: Magnifying narrow-band imaging; EGC: Early gastric cancer; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; N/A: Not applicable.