Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;10:12463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69512-y

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Activity of NTAT and CTAT at various pH and temperature: (A) The activities of NTAT and CTAT were carried out at various temperatures and their relative activities were calculated. NTAT displayed activity similar to that of TAT while CTAT was sensitive to temperature variation largely as seen from the plots. (B) The pH stability of NTAT and CTAT was checked at various pH and their activities were plotted in terms of relative activity. NTAT, as seen in temperature profile, remained stable relative to TAT9 but CTAT displayed reduced activity at extreme pH conditions.