Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;20(4):417–423. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0054

Table 2.

Comparison of our results with the case series from Clotman et al and Stamatouli et al.43,62

Parameter Current study (n=72) Clotman study (n=41) Stamatouli study (n=27)
Median age, years (IQR) 63 (22–83) 63 (28–83) 66 (49–87)
Gender, % (male:female) 52.8:47.2 51.2:48.8 62.9:37.1
Index presentation with DKA or ketosis, % 77.8 71.4 59.0
Diabetes-related autoantibodies, % 44.4 56.0 40.0
GAD positivity, % 39.4 56.0 NCD
HbA1c, mmol/mol (IQR) 53 (39.9–101.1) 53 (46.4–93.4) 63.4 (42.1–90.2)
Proportion of cases with reduced C-peptide <1.1 ng/mL, % 62.5 93.0 85.0
HLA genotypes, % NCD NCD
  • HLA-DR4: 76

  • HLA-DR3: 34.1

  • HLA-DQ8 (DQB1*0302): 38.0

Proportion of patients in whom ICI therapy continued after diagnosing diabetes, % 41.7 NCD 37.0
Proportion of patients treated with insulin for ICI-induced diabetes, % 98.6 NCD NCD

DKA = diabetes-related ketoacidosis; GAD = glutamic acid decarboxylase; HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin; HLA = human leukocyte antigen; ICI = immune checkpoint inhibitor; IQR = interquartile range; NCD = not clearly documented.