Table 3.
Random effect probit models concerning general practitioners and gynaecologists separately (only significant coefficients shown)
| General practitioners (n = 88 subjects leading to 1936 responses)*** |
Gynaecologists (n = 35 subjects leading to 770 responses)*** |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Attribute - Modalities |
Coefficients | S.E. ** | (95% CI)† | p-value | Coefficients | S.E. ** | (95% CI)† | p-value |
| (Intercept) | −0.10 | NS* | 0.03 | NS* | ||||
| Population of women targeted | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||||
| - Unscreened | 0.52 | 0.13 | (0.27; 0.76) | < 0.01 | NS* | |||
| - Women over 50 years old | −0.47 | 0.13 | (−0.73; −0.22) | < 0.01 | − 0.51 | 0.21 | (− 0.92; − 0.10) | 0.01 |
| - From deprived areas | − 0.33 | 0.12 | (-0.58; -0.09) | < 0.01 | −0.61 | 0.20 | (-0.99; -0.24) | < 0.01 |
| - From areas with low rates of screening | 0.33 | 0.14 | (0.05; 0.60) | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.23 | (0.25; 1.15) | < 0.01 |
| - Receiving free supplementary universal health care | NS* | NS* | ||||||
| Stakeholders in act of screening | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||||
| - Current stakeholders and state-registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.10 | (0.24; 0.63) | < 0.01 | NS* | |||
| - Current stakeholders and state-registered nurses and radiologists during mammography | 0.30 | 0.09 | (0.12; 0.48) | < 0.01 | −0.38 | 0.14 | (− 0.65; − 0.10) | < 0.01 |
| - Current stakeholders and radiologists during mammography | NS* | NS* | ||||||
| Technique(s) of uterine cervical cancer screening | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||||
| - Self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing | −0.61 | 0.09 | (− 0.78; − 0.44) | < 0.01 | − 0.45 | 0.14 | (− 0.71; − 0.18) | 0.01 |
| - Choice between pap smear or self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing | − 0.16 | 0.08 | (− 0.32; −4e−3) | < 0.05 | NS* | |||
| Inducement to women to perform screening | < 0.01 | NS* | ||||||
| - Mailed invitation involving attending physician | 0.44 | 0.11 | (0.22; 0.66) | < 0.01 | ||||
| - Mailed invitation without involving attending physician | −0.42 | 0.12 | (−0.66; − 0.19) | < 0.01 | ||||
| - Delivery of screening prescription by student health services | −0.32 | 0.13 | (-0.59; -0.06) | 0.02 | ||||
| - Mailing of screening prescription | NS* | |||||||
| - Delivery of screening prescription by occupational physicians | NS* | |||||||
| Inducement to general practitioners | < 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||
| - Communication of lists of unscreened women to their practitioner | 0.71 | 0.12 | (0.48; 0.94) | < 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.18 | (0.02; 0.72) | 0.04 |
| - Fixed fee for time spent on screening | 0.42 | 0.12 | (0.17; 0.66) | < 0.01 | NS* | |||
| - Increasing fee for Pap smear | NS* | NS* | ||||||
| - Increasing fee for performance concerning uterine cervical cancer screening | NS* | NS* | ||||||
| - Remuneration of consultations dedicated to uterine cervical cancer screening | NS* | NS* | ||||||
* NS: Not Significant
** S.E: Standard Error
*** n is number of observations in model and not the number of practitioners whose responses could be included (i.e. without any missing data), which is n/22
† 95% CI: 95% confidence interval