Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;18(7):531–538. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i7.7370

Table 2.

Comparison of number of spermatogonia, area of reproductive epithelium, and seminiferous tubules diameter in the different groups (n = 10)


Parameters Groups Control (mean ± SD) Experimental 1 (mean ± SD) Experimental 2 (mean ± SD) P-value
Spermatogonia number 37.52 ± 4.14 32.43 ± 6.06a 23.03 ± 4.88b 0.001
Area of reproductive epithelium 36661.65 ± 5706.4 30009.12 ± 8005.49a 15344.34 ± 4164.54b 0.001
Seminiferous tubules diameter 51498.95 ± 6597.87 45517.13 ± 6214.75a 20983.23 ± 6679.39b 0.001
Sertoli cell number 17.168 ± 4.060 16.588 ± 4.543 15.153 ± 5.048 0.603
Leydig cell number 16.513 ± 5.112 14.193 ± 3.701 11.165 ± 1.072c 0.012
Mean ± SD, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc tests,aSignificant between the control group and the experimental group 1(0.2 mg/kg/day);bSignificant between the experimental groups 1 and 2;cSignificant between the control group and the experimental group 2; Control: The group that received distilled water; Experimental 1: The group that received 0.2 mg/kg/day tamsulosin; and Experimental 2: The group that received 0.4 mg/kg/day tamsulosin. SD: standard deviation