Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;21(7):70–76. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12885

Table 2.

Patient‐specific QA (IMRT QA): verification of delivered dose.

Questions Available answers
Which of the following treatment modalities does you institution use? (Check all that apply)

Routine IMRT (Sliding Window, Step and Shoot, Tomotherapy etc.)

VMAT/Rapid Arc

What are your standard tool(s) for verifying that the treatment unit delivers the planned dose for individual patients? (Choose all that apply.)

Point(s) Measurement

Film

2D Diode array

2D Ion Chamber array

EPID

2.D (pseudo 3D) array/multi‐plane array

3D dosimeter

Other

When you make QA measurements, which of the following do you most commonly do?

Deliver beams at the same fixed gantry angle

Deliver at the planned gantry angle

Do you mount your detector on the gantry?

Yes

No

Are your plans usually assessed for pass or fail based on:

Each field‐by‐field measurement

Composite measurement (all fields)

How do you assess agreement (select all that apply), and what are your most commonly used comparison criteria?

Point Dose

Planar

3D/Volumetric analysis

Do you do routine in‐vivo dosimetry for IMRT patients?

Yes

No

If your QA does not meet your passing criteria, what actions do you take? (choose all that apply, rank in order of attempt (1 denotes first strategy))

Remeasure with the same setup (at the same point/plane)

Move to a new calculation point/plane and remeasure

Try fixed gantry angle delivery

Re‐plan

Scale the MU's (partially or fully)

Change the passing criteria for the case

Analyze in relative dose mode instead of absolute dose mode

Document result and deliver the plan

Something else: __________